>
InfraOps · The execution layer, governed

The layer beneath the layer,
finally connected.

Most teams have a Terraform world, an Ansible world, an ITSM world, and three clouds — each one a quiet kingdom. Cindy sits across all of them: reads the request, writes the change, runs the pipeline, files the record. Nothing ripped out; everything finally in conversation.

cindy · across the layer LIVE
01
Ticket received from ServiceNow
request read, context loaded
PARSED
02
Terraform plan drafted
policy-clean, cost-aware
READY
03
Ansible playbook queued
after your approval
STAGED
04
Policy delta noted
eu-region governance lighter than us
FLAGGED
05
Record back to ITSM
audit trail filed automatically
WAITING

The layer that quietly does the work.

The execution layer underneath everything else — Terraform, Ansible, Puppet, your ITSM, every cloud — has always been somebody's quiet labour. Cindy sits across it, so the labour stops being quiet, and stops being a person.

Sits on what you already use

Terraform, Ansible, Puppet, CloudFormation — Cindy works with whichever you already run, no rip-and-replace. Zero migration cost.

Bridge to ITSM

ServiceNow, BMC Remedy, Jira — tickets become validated, executable pipelines. Approve a ticket → Cindy validates → pipeline runs → ticket auto-closes.

Multi-cloud, single conversation

AWS, Azure, GCP, on-prem — one natural-language interface. No swivel-chair between consoles. The same question, the same answer, anywhere.

Governance as code

Policy library defined once, audited continuously, drift auto-remediated across every cloud. The rule lives in one place; enforcement is everywhere.

Drift, across boundaries

When one cloud has wandered while you were not looking, Cindy says so. The fix is in the same shape as a fix anywhere else.

Identity, end to end

Who can do what, in which environment, today. The answer should not depend on which cloud, or which ITSM ticket, you are asking about.

"Which clusters drifted from baseline?" Across all of them.

A platform lead asks about drift, expecting a per-cloud answer. Cindy gives a single answer across the whole estate, separates the real drift from the false alarms, and proposes a single reconciliation step.

cindy · in conversation LIVE
> which clusters drifted from baseline?
[LOOKING] Across every cluster, every region. Most are clean. Two look different from declared.
> both real?
Only one. [FIRST] A European cluster has a few hand-edits that were not made through your usual path — that is the audit-relevant kind. [SECOND] An American one diverged because autoscaling did its job and the baseline is a little behind.
> reconcile.
[STAGED] A change opened for the European one; baseline refreshed on the American. You approve; the drift resolves on merge. Witness filed.
2
Look different
1
Actually is
0
Surprises
What Cindy saw
european cluster · hand-edits outside the usual pathaudit
american cluster · autoscaling, baseline behindcosmetic
every other cluster · cleanfine
policies applied uniformlyeven

See this run on your operations.

You just watched the scenario. Book a demo and we will point Cindy at a slice of your real stack — you decide nothing until you have seen exactly what Cindy would do.

Holds every cloud in the same picture

Ask Cindy's about your clouds.

Show Cindy's one of them. Let Cindy's tell you what Cindy would say to the others. Decide nothing until the picture feels right.